Look, it’s so fucking simple even a television presenter could understand it.
If you give me a delivery date, and use the word “guaranteed” when you do it, and the item is in stock, it is NOT FUCKING ACCEPTABLE to then miss that delivery date.
It really isn’t. Look, here, I’ll look up the fucking definition of “guarantee” for you.
Here: “an assurance for the fulfillment of a condition“. You see? An assurance. As in, you are assuring me that my purchase will be with me on the date you fucking say it will.
OTHERWISE WHAT’S THE POINT? “Oh well the post service can’t always blah blah blah…” Well then you shouldn’t be throwing fucking guarantees around like they’re free, then should you? SHOULD YOU, CUNT?
Just fuck off, Amazon. Really. Just fuck off.
An undoubtedly fine point, robustly rendered, as ever. I guess amazon may be thinking that if they didnt pump up the false appearances in this way, people might not give them any money. While I could understand such underpants more from companies with more competitors, as an idea I find this harder to fly with Amazon.
Underpants? Do you mean “Fucking Codshit”, by any chance?
And while you’re off looking for some balls, get a name.
Aside from that, thanks for playing.